Browse
Membership
Why join? Member benefits Healthcare HMCA discounts benefits For Individuals For Students and ECTs For Educational Institutions NSEAD Member Assistance Programme New Member Portal Join Us
Resources
The Big Landscape Curriculum Primary Education Anti-Racist Art Education Research, reports and reviews Units of Work Drawing Design Craft Digital Media NSEAD 22 Video Library Health & Safety Ofsted Research Review
Publications
iJADE AD Magazine START library Books NSEAD Shop Archive Life after lockdown #NSEADcreate: Learning Online
Courses & Events
Events CPD and Training E-Learning
Professional Learning Community
About NSEAD NSEAD Awards Advocacy Policy and Research NSEAD Directories Regional Networks Groups
News
Trade Union
Trade Union: Industrial Action Advice About the union How to seek help Legal advice & aid Trade Union FAQs Health and Safety Updates Careers advice COVID-19 Advice and Guidance Useful Links Introducing Sensitive Topics into the Art, Craft and Design Curriculum TOOLKIT
Join Us

NSEAD Survey Report 2015-16

The NSEAD Survey Report 2015-16 documents the findings of NSEAD’s largest and most comprehensive survey to date and answers the question: In the last five years how has government policy impacted on art, craft and design education?

The Report details 14 key findings which show how government policies have impacted not only on the value of the subject, but on the time and resources needed for children and young people to participate and excel in art, craft and design. These changes, evidenced throughout NSEAD’s report, are reducing opportunities and choices to engage in a broad and balanced curriculum and risk jeopardising and limiting the UK as a creative and competitive force in a global market.

Selected key findings include:

A. Curriculum provision in art and design:

Key finding and evidence: Learning opportunities in art, craft and design across all key stages have reduced significantly.

• At least a third and up to 44% of teacher responses over all key stages indicate that time allocated for art and design had decreased in the last five years.

Key finding and evidence: Provision for art and design is increasingly influenced by school type/sector. At key stage 3 and 4 academy sponsors have seen the biggest reduction in time allocated for the subject.

• More art and design teachers in academy sponsors reported a reduction in the time allocated for art and design at key stage 3 (55%) and key stage 4 (42%) than in any other sector.

B. The value given to art and design in schools:

Key finding and evidence: The value given to art and design has impacted on the choice and provision of art and design qualifications offered for both higher and lower ability students.

• Teachers across all sectors indicated that their schools were more likely to enable lower ability students to take art and design qualifications than higher ability students.

• Respondents teaching in free schools were the most likely (93%) to agree/strongly agree that their schools enable lower ability students to study art and design. However, they were also the most likely (32%) to disagree/strongly disagree that their schools enable higher ability students to study art and design.

Key finding and evidence: Opportunities for examination groups to work with creative practitioners or to engage with original works of art, craft and design in galleries and museums, varies according to school sector:

• 82% of independent school art and design teachers indicated that their schools support the principle that every examination group should engage with artworks first hand in galleries and museums and/or through meeting practitioners. In contrast, only 36% of free school art and design teachers said their schools support this principle.

C. Professional development opportunities in art and design:

Key finding and evidence: Access to relevant CPD in art and design is limited and for some teachers subject-specific training is non-existent. Significant numbers of art and design specialists in all phases ‘rarely or never’ receive CPD.

• 55% of primary subject coordinators rarely or never attend subject-specific CPD.

• Over half (51%) of all art and design teachers in independent schools attend CPD annually, this drops to under a third (31%) of all art and design teachers in the state sector

D. Wellbeing and workload of art and design educators:

Key finding and evidence: The reduced profile and value of the subject have contributed to art and design teachers leaving or wanting to leave the profession.

• 56% of respondents reported that the reduced profile and value of the subject (56%) by government and school management had contributed towards teachers leaving or wanting to leave the profession.

Recommendations

Based on the survey’s key findings the report lists a series of recommendations for a wide group of stakeholders.

We are asking the Department for Education, parents, head teachers and school governors, Ofsted, Creative Industries Federation and creative industry leaders, the Local Government Association, Arts Council England and higher education institutions to help address the impact of policies on our subject by supporting and acting on these recommendations.

The recommendations include:

Schools should review the time allocated for the teaching and learning of art and design within the curriculum, adjusting the mechanisms and barriers that deplete time resulting in damage to standards in art and design, in primary schools and through carousel systems, shorter lessons and compressed key stage 3.

Parents should, through membership of parent teacher associations and as parent governors, hold the governance and management of the school accountable for the appropriate time, resources, facilities and value given to art and design on the curriculum and in the professional development of its teachers and support staff

The Department for Education should decline from stating or inferring that higher education and career opportunities will be limited by examination study in art and design, thus misrepresenting the subject to parents and young people

Download the full report here.

Download key findings and recommendations here.

Back
When
9th February 2016
Share

See the latest NSEAD News Stories

School Funding and Pupil Premium Report
news

The Sutton Trust have published a report which shows the impact of the cost of living crisis on the financial pressures this is taking on school budgets.

Find out more
How can we build strong foundations for the future of the Arts in schools?
news

Today saw the release of a new report The Arts in Schools: Foundations for the Future, published by A New Direction and the Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation…

Find out more
NFER’s Annual Teacher Labour Market Report 2023
news
Initial Teacher Education

NFER’s Annual Teacher Labour Market report monitors on the progress in the recruitment system in England. The report predicts that there will be continued…

Find out more
Invest in arts subjects to protect our children’s futures
news

Michele Gregson, general secretary of NSEAD's Guardian letter, calls on the government for long-term investment in arts subjects

Find out more
Learn More
About NSEAD T&Cs Support us Funding from the Paul Hamlyn Foundation Legal / Privacy News Letter Invest in arts subjects to protect our children’s futures
Company
Support our work
Support
01225 810134 Contact Us
Advertise with us
Learn more
Follow Us
© 2023 NSEAD | All Rights Reserved
Site by Grandad Digital