Browse
Membership
Why join? Member benefits Healthcare HMCA discounts benefits For Individuals For Students and ECTs For Educational Institutions NSEAD Member Assistance Programme New Member Portal Join Us
Resources
The Big Landscape Anti-Racist Art Education Curriculum Primary Education Teaching Inspiration Research, reports and reviews NSEAD 22 Video Library Health & Safety
Publications
iJADE AD Magazine Books NSEAD Shop Archive Life after lockdown #NSEADcreate: Learning Online
Courses & Events
Events CPD and Training E-Learning
Professional Learning Community
About NSEAD NSEAD Awards Advocacy Policy and Research groups NSEAD Directories Regional Networks Groups
News
Trade Union
Trade Union: Industrial Action Advice About the union How to seek help Legal advice & aid Trade Union FAQs Health and Safety Updates Careers advice COVID-19 Advice and Guidance Useful Links Introducing Sensitive Topics into the Art, Craft and Design Curriculum TOOLKIT
Join Us

The distinctiveness of Art & Design and D&T – ensuring schools provide for high-quality provision in both

– ensuring schools provide for high-quality provision in both

Since the introduction of a slimmed down art and design national curriculum in 2014, NSEAD has provided resources to help our members make explicit the requirements of a broad and balanced art, craft and design curriculum. Our much used parallel curriculum and assessment and progression materials (hyperlink here) are two examples. However, the consequences of government policies in education, to include funding cuts and school performance measures, have resulted in some members indicating that their schools have attempted to merge, art & design with D&T. In 2016 at The All-Party Parliamentary Group for Art, Craft and Design in Education, we first reported on the implications of such mergers.

In May 2019, Ofqual reported that GCSE candidate numbers for art and design had increased by 3% (hyperlink here). In June 2018, the DfE reported that there had been another fall in art and design key stage 4 hours taught – between 2011 and 2017 the decrease had been as much as 21.1%. The numbers do not add up.

With these discrepancies in full view and guided by reports from members in schools, we are concerned that the apparent rise in GCSE Art and Design masks the true picture of how and where it is being taught. Furthermore Ofqual indicates there has been a 28% decrease in D&T GCSE candidates this year. Whether it is within D&T departments by art and design trained teachers or by D&T trained teachers, there is a real risk that students are being offered a curriculum lacking breadth and depth.

In this briefing paper and presentation for NSEAD members, Ged Gast, former president of NSEAD, has set out the distinctiveness of art and design; misconceptions about similarities with D&T, and why some schools might seek to merge art & design and D&T departments. The paper also examines the potential implications, impact and outcomes on learning and curriculum provision that result from such mergers.

The paper will help subject leaders and senior management teams to better understand that art and design and D&T are complementary subjects, and that they are not an alternative to each other – the study of one does not replace the other.

The paper also helpfully examines the ‘design’ in art, craft & design and proposes ways to ensure your art and design department team will understand the value of both subjects and how to make explicit the subject differences.

Notably, NSEAD members in Scotland have not reported such mergers. The uniqueness of art and design and expressive arts, sit explicitly away from the study of product and technology and engineering based subjects.

What next? The Society is currently evidencing these changes and welcomes any comments or examples from teachers of art and design who may have experienced changes to their art and design and D&T curriculum or examination offer. This may be reflected in changes to staffing, timetable, curriculum and/or examination endorsements offered. Please email your comments to [javascript protected email address]. We also welcome any feedback from members in response to this paper. Your comments and expertise will inform and help us to evidence an NSEAD members’ webinar on the distinctiveness of Art and Design and D&T and the benefits of planning and providing for both.

This is members' only content. To view this paper please visit our Research and Reports section and follow the instructions to download it.

Back
When
11th July 2019
Share

See latest NSEAD news....

Standardising portfolios for art and design-related university applications
news

Further to issues raised by the NSEAD community about the process and impact of multiple portfolio generation on students, we conducted an indicative…

Find out more
School Funding and Pupil Premium Report
news

The Sutton Trust have published a report which shows the impact of the cost of living crisis on the financial pressures this is taking on school budgets.

Find out more
How can we build strong foundations for the future of the Arts in schools?
news

Today saw the release of a new report The Arts in Schools: Foundations for the Future, published by A New Direction and the Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation…

Find out more
NFER’s Annual Teacher Labour Market Report 2023
news
Initial Teacher Education

NFER’s Annual Teacher Labour Market report monitors on the progress in the recruitment system in England. The report predicts that there will be continued…

Find out more
News homepage
Learn More
About NSEAD T&Cs Support us Funding from the Paul Hamlyn Foundation Legal / Privacy News Letter Invest in arts subjects to protect our children’s futures
Company
Support our work
Support
01225 810134 Contact Us
Advertise with us
Learn more
Follow Us
© 2023 NSEAD | All Rights Reserved
Site by Grandad Digital